Which type of agency leads to relationships formed by necessity?

Implied agency refers to a type of agency relationship that arises from the conduct of the parties involved, rather than a formal agreement or contract. This relationship often comes into play when the actions of one party lead another party to reasonably believe that they are acting on behalf of the first party. The necessity of the situation can create such a relationship, especially in contexts where one party must act to protect the interests of another.

In many instances, implied agency arises in situations where there is an immediate need for action, and it would be unreasonable to expect formal consent or a written agreement before proceeding. For example, if a person is unable to act on their own behalf (perhaps due to being incapacitated or in an emergency), others may step in to act for them. The necessity of the circumstance supports the formation of the agency because it serves the best interest of the party who cannot act.

The other options, such as express agency, involve clear and direct agreements, often documented, between the parties. This differs from implied agency, where consent is inferred rather than explicitly stated. Similarly, optional agency and ordinary agency do not inherently depend on the necessity concept that characterizes implied agency. Thus, the context and dynamics of agency relationships highlight why implied agency is recognized for